ECONOMICS 184

Economics 184 Assignment, Class and TA Section Schedule
Spring 2019
version date: 2019.4.17

 

Problem Set Due Dates
PS 1 due Fri 2/25 at 9AM
PS 2 due Wed 2/6 at 5PM
PS 3 due Wed 2/20 at 9AM
PS4 due Wed 4/3 at 5PM
PS 5 due Wed 4/17 at 5PM
PS 6 and PS 7 due on same day, Wed 5/1

Shopping / Wait-List Policy
This course does not have a capacity constraint.  All students seeking enrollment will be admitted.

Class Calendar (see below for TA session Calendar)

Day Date Topic Due Text* Background Optional
1 M 1/14 Introduction FT 1         or
KOM9 1,2
Coming and Going (Economist 2016.10.3)It’s a Flat World After All (NYT 2005.4.3)Perils in Trade Deals When Factories Close and Towns Struggle (NYT 2015.5.18); Laptops are Great But Not During a Lecture (NYT 2017.11.22) How Can They Charge That? (NYT 2013.5.11);    What is Wrong (and Right) in Economics? (Rodrik 2013.5.7); What is Economics Good For? (NYT 2013.8.24); Hauling New Treasure Along the Silk Road (NYT 2013.7.20)38 Maps That Explain the Global Economy (Vox)
2 W 1/16 Ricardo 1 FT 2        or
KOM9 3
The Pencil (PBS 1980); Ricardo’s Difficult Idea (Krugman Archive);      Alan Deardorff’s Glossary of International Economics The Ricardian Model (Deardorff 2007), What was Mercantilism? (Economist 2013.8.23)
3 F 1/18 Ricardo 2 Report Bolsters the Case for Large U.S. Natural Gas Exports (NYT 2012.12.5), Energy Exports are Good (NYT 2013.5.17) Reaping the Gains from Specialization (NYT 2009.3.18), Putting Ricardo to Work (JEP 2012)
4 W 1/23 Ricardo 3 PS 1 due  Fri 1/25 FT 4        or
KOM9 5
Introduction to the Lerner Diagram (Deardorff 2002); How to Build a Lerner Diagram (Khandelwal and Schott 2008); Visualizing Lerner (Deardorff 2010)
5 M 1/28 HO 1 Free Trade: You’re Doing It Wrong (FP 2013.2.4) Boom in Energy Spurs Industry in the Rust Belt (NYT 2014.9.9)
6 W 1/30 HO 2 Globalization Anxiety as Mass Hysteria? (Rodrik 2008.6.10)
7 M 2/4 HO 3 Second Thoughts on Free Trade (NYT 2004.1.6) What to Expect When Your’re Free Trading (NYT 2008.1.16)
8 W 2/6 HO 4 PS 2 due Wed 2/6 FT 3        or KOM9 4 As Crop Prices Soar Iowa Farms Add Acreage (NYT 2011.12.30) The Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries (NBER 2007)
9 M 2/11 Ricardo-Viner 1 A Wave of Sewing Jobs as Orders Pile Up at U.S. Factories (NYT 2013.9.29)
10 W 2/13 Ricardo-Viner 2 Japan’s Rice Farmers Fear Their Future Is Shrinking (NYT 2009.3.28), Sugar Rules Defy Free-Trade Logic (NYT 2001.5.6) Free Trade: No Longer Just a Case of North vs South (NYT 1991.6.23)
11 M 2/18 Ricardo-Viner 3 Introduction to the Two-Cone HO Equilibrium (Deardorff 2002) The HO Model in Theory and Practice (Leamer 1995)
12 W 2/20 Ricardo-Viner 4 PS 3 due 2/20 5pm Economic Recovery, Made in Bangladesh? (NYT 2013.5.20) Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade (Rogowski 1987)
13 M 2/25 Multi-Cone HO 1 This Is What Trump and Sanders Get Wrong About Free Trade (Washpo 2016.5.17); The Geography of Government Benefits (NYT 2012.2.11) How Technology Wrecks the Middle Class (NYT 2013.8.24)
14 W 2/27 MIDTERM (practice midterm posted on Canvas in files) LOCATION:  IN CLASS
No extensions or make-ups allowed w/o Dean’s Excuse
15 M 3/4 Multi-Cone HO 2 The Free Trade Paradox (New Yorker 2008.5.26), Leapfrogging or Piggybacking (Economist 2008.11.8), Not Really Made in China (WSJ 2010.12.16);    China and Cheap Imports: Champions of Equality (Vox 2008.7.3); Gift-Bearing Officials Try to Lure Chinese Factories Inland (NYT 2014.8.27); Robots may cut off the path to prosperity in the developing world (FT 2016.6.21); Premature Deindustrialization (Rodrik 2015) Downriver, Upmarket (Economist 2014.9.16); China’s Emergence as a Manufacturing Juggernaut (Philly Fed 2009), How the US Lost Out on iPhone Work (NYT 2012.1.22)How Does China Compete with Developed Countries? (Vox 2007.10.10); Outsourcing and the Shift from Manufacturing to Services (CP 2013/4), Polanyi’s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth (Autor 2014)
16 W 3/6 Guest Lecture: Lorenzo Caliendo
Spring Break 3/8-24
Spring Break reading recommendations: The Choice (Russell Roberts), Guns Germs and Steel (Jared Diamond)
The Craft of Economics (Ed Leamer), The Transpacific Partnership and ‘Free Trade’ (comic book criticizing free trade by Michael Goodwin)
17 M 3/25 Estimating Trade Gains Twenty Years of NAFTA (NPR); Obama’s Free Trade Conundrum (NYT 2014.1.29) China bird flu causes feather shortage for shuttlecock industry (Guardian 2013.5.7)
18 W 3/27 Tariffs 1 FT 8,9     or KOM9 9 How Special Interests Hide the True Costs of Tariffs (NYT 2018.8.29);    Free Trade and the Steel Industry (Milton Friedman on Youtube), Sugar Tariffs Cost Americans $2.5 Billion in 2009 (Perry 2010.1.30) World Trade Report: Subsidies, Trade and the WTO (WTO 2006); Trade Barriers for Sugar (IGM Formum 2012.8.27);          The Impact of Russia’s 2010 Grain Export Ban (Oxfam 2011)
19 M 4/1 Tariffs 2 The Reason Converse Sneakers Have Fuzzy Bottoms (BI 2015.8.10);    Why We Are All Crony Capitalists (NYT 2014.6.19); No Strings Attached (GTM 2013); Remember that Jobless Recovery? China’s Fault (WSJ 2013.1.7), Chocolate Factory, Trade War Victim (NYT 2013.10.29) United States and Mexico Reach Tomato Deal, Averting a Trade War (NYT 2013.2.3)
20 W 4/3 Tariffs 3 PS 4 due 5 pm FT 6        or
KOM9 10
Shipping Doldrums Offer Opportunities (FT 2015.12.22); What’s the Matter With Eastern Kentucky?; Revisiting the death of distance (Vox 2009.9.12); Globalisation and the costs of international trade from 1870 to the present (Vox 2008.8.16);            Predatory pricing examples: Gunpowder; Sugar; British Shipping; American Airlines Kazakhstan’s Bet on Rail (NYT 2013.11.20); The Shipping Container (Atlantic 2013.12.2); Aboard a Cargo Colossus (NYT 2014.10.3); Adapting Listerine to a Global Market (NYT 2014.9.12)
21 M 4/8 Gravity FT 6        or KOM9 7 A Brief History of Shipping (WSJ 2018.1.29); Variety, the spice of life, has measurable value (NYT 2004.6.17); Paul Krugman, Nobel (Forbes 2008.10.31)
22 W 4/10 Krugman 1 What Happened When Two Countries Liberalized Trade? Pain, then Gain (NYT 2005.1.27)
23 M 4/15 Krugman 2 KOM9 8 Does Management Matter? (Bloom et al. 2011),
Why Do Management Practices Differ Across Countries? (Bloom et al. 2010)
24 W 4/17 Melitz 1 PS 5 due 5 pm Can European firms close their ‘management gap’ with the US? (Vox 2007.7.12); Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform (Vox 2013.1.15) Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence From Chinese Exporters (Khandelwal et al. 2012)
25 M 4/22 Melitz 2 The Economics of a $6.75 Shirt (WSJ 2013.5.16);    Herd Instinct (Economist 2013.1.19)How a ‘model’ employee got away with outsourcing his software job to China (G&M 2013.1.17);Lessons from the Glaxo Case in China (NYT 2013.7.29). A Wave of Sewing Jobs as Orders Pile Up at U.S. Factories (NYT 2013.9.29) The Mall of the World (FP 2011.11.25); The End of Cheap China (Economist 2012.3.10); US CEO Blasts French Work Habits (WSJ 2013.2.20); Why manufacturing can be an effective tool for gender empowerment (WSJ 20149.5)
26 W 4/24 Melitz 3 & wrap up The Economics of a $6.75 Shirt (WSJ 2013.5.16); Herd Instinct (Economist 2013.1.19), How a ‘model’ employee got away with outsourcing his software job to China (G&M 2013.1.17); Lessons from the Glaxo Case in China (NYT 2013.7.29); A Wave of Sewing Jobs as Orders Pile Up at U.S. Factories (NYT 2013.9.29) The Mall of the World (FP 2011.11.25); The End of Cheap China (Economist 2012.3.10); US CEO Blasts French Work Habits (WSJ 2013.2.20); China Turns To Africa For Resources, Jobs And Future Customers (Fresh Air 2014.5.27)
PS 6 & 7 due on same day, Wed 5/1 5 pm Double Standards on Trade (Rodrik 2007.4.30), Trade and Procedural Fairness (Rodrik 2007.4.26)
Final Exam
Date: Saturday May 4 at 7pm
Location: TBA
Please arrive promptly
No extensions or make-ups allowed
*FT = International Trade by Feenstra and Taylor (3rd)
KOM9 = Krugman, Obstfeld and Melitz (starting edition 9).

TA Session Calendar

Week Beginning Objectives
1 1/14 No TA section this week.
2 1/21 Review of solving the Ricardian model. Here is a helpful write-up of the relevant equations, to complement the figures in the lecture notes.
3 1/28 Discussion of students’ answers to PS1 # 19 (Peter Navarro’s editorial in the NYT).
Other review of PS 1 as requested and time allows.
4 2/4 Discussion of students answers to PS 2 problem #13-15 (Daniel Altman’s editorial in FP).
Other review of PS 2 as requested and time allows.
5 2/11 Review of finding the RV equilibrium.
6 2/18 Review of RV model and practice mid-term.
7 2/25 Review of mid-term exam questions.
8 3/4 Discussion of students answers to PS 3 problem #10 (Adam Dean’s editorial in the WP).
BREAK
9 3/25 Review of PS3. Answer questions related to multi-cone HO model.
10 4/1 Review of PS4. Answer questions related to tariffs and quotas.
11 4/8 TBD
12 4/15 TBD
13 4/22 TBD
14 4/29 TBD
15 5/6 TBD

Syllabus

Course Summary
This course covers a set of conceptual tools that are useful for understanding “globalization”. We will use these tools to answer questions about how countries, firms and workers respond to international trade.

Pre-requisites
Two terms of introductory economics

Contact Info
Peter K. Schott
165 Whitney Avenue, Room 3524
203.436.4260
peter.schott@yale.edu

Office Hours
There are two ways to schedule an office visit: (i) send me an email with a few times that work for you and I will pick one; (ii) email me a few minutes before you want to drop by, and if I am in I will respond immediately.

Teaching Assistants
Daisuke Adachi (daisuke.adachi@yale.edu)
Charles Cai (charles.cai@yale.edu)

Discussion Sections
TBD

Class Participation
I encourage discussion. Please ask questions during class. I will feel free to call on you.

Laptops are NOT permitted in class. Please see me if this creates undue difficulty.

Website
A website for this class will be maintained on Canvas. All lecture slides, homeworks, optional readings, case studies and study materials will be posted to this website.

Textbooks
There are two recommended textbooks that complement the lectures, problem sets and exams. I recommend you get ONE of these as there is NO NEED to have both. They are:

International Trade by Feenstra and Taylor. This text is now in its fourth edition (ISBN-13: 978-1319061739), but either the first (ISBN 978-1429206907) or second edition (ISBN 978-1429241045) is fine for our purposes, and they are much cheaper.   Note that Feenstra and Taylor have also produced a version of this book that contains international macro chapters which is called International Economics. We will not be using those chapters, but the first half of this larger textbook contains the trade chapters.

International Economics by Krugman, Obstfeld and Melitz. This text, beginning with the ninth edition (ISBN 978-0132961646), has a nice discussion of recent models of firms and trade (chapter 8). Any edition after the ninth would be fine for this course.

Required Readings
Required readings can be accessed via the hyperlinks above or from the “recommended readings” folder on classes v2.

Optional Readings
You are encouraged to read the business section of a major newspaper/website (e.g., NYT, WDJ, FT, Economist, etc.) every day to familiarize themselves with current trends in “globalization”. I may send articles to you periodically during the semester, or ask you to find an discuss an article as part of a problem set. I have also posted some good articles to the syllabus above and to the ClassesV2 website.

Optional Books
The following books are optional and quite good:

Free Trade Under Fire by Doug Irwin
The Choice by Russell Roberts
Pop Internationalism by Paul Krugman

Case Studies
The class will likely make use of one or two case studies published by the Harvard Business School. These will be posted to the class schedule and Canvas as the semester proceeds.

Class Assignments
Problem sets are to be handed in electronically via Canvas if possible, or at the front of the classroom at the beginning of class on the day they are due. Problem sets are posted to the “assignments” section of Canvas. Problem set due dates are as noted on the class calendar and in the “assignments” section of Canvas. I reserve the right to add/subtract assignments as we go along. Problem sets are equally weighted. The lowest problem set score will be dropped, except in the case of any “double” assignments, in which case only half of the low grade will be dropped.

You may work with up to 1 partner on problem sets, and hand in the solutions either jointly or individually. If you work with a partner YOU MUST DECLARE THIS on the solutions you hand in

NOTE: use of solution sets from prior-year assignments is expressly forbidden and will be considered a violation of academic integrity.

Grading
Final grades are determined as follows:

Problem Sets (30 percent)
In class and final exam (2 x 35 = 70 percent)

Academic Integrity / Group Work

No student’s name should appear on a group project if the student has not contributed to the production of the project. The following is an example of unacceptable conduct:   Neo agrees to produce a case write-up, putting Trinity’s name on the case write-up. Trinity agrees to repay Neo by producing a subsequent assignment on his own.

In group work, all group members are responsible for the integrity of work that is submitted. Group members should always question other members about the source of material and analysis that is being included in group projects. If a group member has any concerns about the integrity of material being submitted by the group, that group member should discuss those concerns with the instructor.

Plagiarism: the members of any academic community are expected not to present ideas or material from other sources as their own. In the context of this course, it is acceptable to, for example:

Refer to concepts, frameworks, and analytical tools from the readings or class lectures without citation. For example, you may refer to the five forces, added value, sustainable competitive advantage, signaling, and so on without citing the source.

Refer to the material in cases without citations. For example, you do not need to cite the HBS case in your case analysis when you refer to factual information from the text or tables.

Quote or paraphrase analysis from another source and present it as your own. For example, it would be unacceptable to find an analysis of your case project company on the web and quote or paraphrase it in the analysis you hand in without correctly attributing it. There is a difference between consulting a source and then forming your own opinion based on what you have read, and “lifting” material directly.